Skip to main content

Quick and stolen

I have not felt very motivated lately to write. I have ideas, and even formulate blog posts; but it is always when I am hours away from actually being able to sit at a computer and type it out. One of the things I am really tired of hearing is the doom and gloom over our economy. Here is an analysis by a money manager from Raleigh I just read: 1.US employment: Today, our unemployment rate is roughly 5%. Last year at this time, the unemployment rate was 4.5%. Five years ago, the rate was 6%. The average rate of unemployment over the past 50 years is 5.86%. So, the rate of unemployment is higher today than a year ago, but it is by no means stark. A fair number of economists have set the “natural” rate of unemployment at about 6% to account for those people temporarily off of payrolls. Some would argue that the current trend is bad, but they typically go too far in assuming that small trends will become long-term trends. (These are the same types of forecasters who, in the 60s, projected overpopulation would cause worldwide economic calamity): 2. Disposable income: The average household income in 2006 was $48,201. In 2005, it was $46,326. Ten years ago it was $38,885. Real US disposable income has been rising nicely for over 40 years. On balance, it would be extremely difficult to contend that people have a lower standard of living today than five years ago; 3. US inflation: The current rate of inflation is 3.98%. Last year, it was 2.78%. Over the past 50 years, the average rate has been about 4.10%. While gas prices are definitely a problem in the US right now, especially for lower and middle income earners (and especially with relation to our dependence upon foreign oil), overall price inflation is acceptable and even positive. Do you remember the late ’70s? Starting in the late ’70s, Paul Volcker’s Federal Reserve made a great effort to curb the devastating effects of inflation in the United States; 4. U.S. interest rates: If you want to buy a house today, the average 30-year mortgage will cost you 5.97%. Ten years ago, the same interest rate might have been 7.13%. Thirty years ago, the rate would have been 9.2%. The “credit crunch” we are experiencing (whatever that is; I have yet to hear an acceptable or uniformly applied definition of “credit crunch”) might be noise on the screen, but people and businesses are still able to borrow cheaply, which is all that counts on an aggregate level. In order for banks to make money, they need to lend money. Let’s assume that banks want to make money. If they lend money at low rates of interest and people are buying things, this component will be fine; 5. U.S. GDP growth: In the last quarter, GDP growth was 0.6%, which, while nothing to write home about, is positive, not negative. Last year, GDP growth was 2.2%. Five years ago, it was 2.5%. The average real rate of GDP growth for the past 50 years has been 3.31%. It is clear that GDP is slipping today, which is not good at all, but real GDP growth is still positive, albeit anemic. It makes sense that, after almost 10 years of high growth, it might slow down for a short time. (Keep in mind that the average “recessionary” GDP cycle has been about 11 months, while the average expansionary cycle has been about four years I have a post or two on here about the economy as well. Actually, except for a few isolated areas and industries - our economy is still doing great. And, we are still the envy of the world. The news media has a vested interest in making things seem bad. People vote out incumbent politicians when they feel things are bad. Plus bad news makes headlines, and great sound bites. Enjoy

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts and Ideas for 2024

 If you are truly pressed for time, just read the bold, italicized, and underlined sentences. That won't take you long at all! Another year has passed and if you are reading this, a new one is getting ready to start (or has started) for you. New Year’s celebrations are a time for reflection on what has happened and also a chance to start anew. New Year’s resolutions are a manifestation of this. Weight loss plans, gym proprietors, exercise equipment makers, and others know this. If you have watched any TV, gone online, or read any magazines or newspapers you know that the people that make their living selling and signing people up for those things are hitting it hard. We like new beginnings and the chance to reset and set new goals. Losing weight, stopping smoking, cut back or stopping drinking, and other things a lot of folks see as improvement are at the forefront of our collective thoughts and efforts this time of year. Although not a real advocate of New Year’s resolutions, I

Houston (and Miami, L.A., New York City, Winston-Salem, etc), we have a problem!

People, we have a real problem with our government. I can see a lot of you clicking away - "He's getting political again". BUT WAIT - READ ON. This not specifically a political problem, at least not a political problem specific to one party. We have a systemic and pervasive problem with our elected "representatives" in government. It affects the government at all levels. It is much more of a problem as you get farther away from the voters - ie Washington vs your town hall, but it is a problem everywhere.  It is to the point now that if you are a member of one party, anything a member of the other party comes up with of any significance is said to be wrong. I know this is a bit of an overstatement; but I submit, not much of one. There are still a few important issues that are worked on in a bipartisan manner, but not many and usually not by the "leadership" of the parties. As I said above, this is not a Republican problem nor a Democrat problem. Both

Take two and call the ambulance in the morning

Here we go. I have been working on this one for a long time. I want to start by letting any of you that do not know me (and reminding those that do) - I am NOT a doctor. I have no formal medical training at all. What is listed here is documented reality and my evaluations of those facts.   I have been doing a LOT of studying and reading about what I now believe to be one of the biggest medical hoaxes in human history - the demonization of cholesterol and fats. First, some background. The cholesterol as killer philosophy is relatively new. However, the entire premise is flawed. The thought that cholesterol is bad was taken from the fact that plaque buildup in artery walls contains high amounts of cholesterol. The problem is, cholesterol is there because that is one of it's jobs. Finding cholesterol in arteries (BTW, finding plaque buildups in veins does not happen, more in a bit) and saying it causes the blockages and disease is like noting that every time you see a car wreck