Skip to main content

Houston (and Miami, L.A., New York City, Winston-Salem, etc), we have a problem!

People, we have a real problem with our government. I can see a lot of you clicking away - "He's getting political again". BUT WAIT - READ ON. This not specifically a political problem, at least not a political problem specific to one party. We have a systemic and pervasive problem with our elected "representatives" in government. It affects the government at all levels. It is much more of a problem as you get farther away from the voters - ie Washington vs your town hall, but it is a problem everywhere. 

It is to the point now that if you are a member of one party, anything a member of the other party comes up with of any significance is said to be wrong. I know this is a bit of an overstatement; but I submit, not much of one. There are still a few important issues that are worked on in a bipartisan manner, but not many and usually not by the "leadership" of the parties. As I said above, this is not a Republican problem nor a Democrat problem. Both parties have gotten to the point of doing this. The way you can verify it is by reading and paying attention. Both Democrats and Republicans in the past eight years or so have had a plan for something brought up that was ridiculed by the other party. Then, years later with the other party in power, the same idea (or almost identical) is brought up by the party that ridiculed it and it is ridiculed by the original party! (read that again if you have to, it is a but meandering) The main problem with this is nothing gets done! All time is spent in blasting the other party's ideas or on reelection.

The government is being run by people that seem to be totally disengaged with the population, except for the six months prior to elections. At that point the promises made are fabulous. Every problem we have from border security to welfare have a solution. Then, when elected, they go back up and do the exact same things! Again, this is Republicans and Democrats. The sad thing is, we (the voters) let them get away with it. Why would a politician do anything differently when they can do this over and over. All you have to do is talk the talk during the campaign and then walk however you want when elected. Then repeat and you get elected again, and again, and again...

Let's go to the graphics:



FYI, in 2008 - 87% of House incumbents were reelected. In 2010 - 91%, so it was statistically the same as historical data.  In the Senate it was 91% in 2008 and 84% in 2010, so also statistically the norm.

Interestingly (at least to me) was that the Senate has averaged a bit more turnover than the House. FYI, that goes totally against what the framers of the Constitution were looking for. The House of Representatives was to be the "people's chamber" with two year terms. Well, the terms are still two years, but people keep coming back! This is a fairly recent phenomenon. Until the mid-20th century most politicians in both the House and Senate served one term and went home. Then, somewhere during the great depression and WWII era, politics became a career. Woe is us.

There are two answers I see to this problem. The easiest lies with US, the voters. We have to vote the incumbents out! It amazes me that some of these people are voted in after legal problems, scandals, idiotic statements, and going against almost all significant campaign promises. But again, why should the politicians worry about it when they know they will be reelected. We must hold them accountable! Actually the real answer lies in term limits. Jobs in government should NOT be careers, at least not the elected ones. (I am actually a fan of rolling the bureaucracy as well. Some of the unelected bureaucrats have WAY too much power) A House member should serve eight years or so MAX. A senator, maybe the same. Now, this would require a constitutional amendment, but it is critical.

We the people - must act. Nothing is being done in Washington or most state capitals; or at least not the will of the people. It is on us now.






























Comments

I agree. Run for office! How are we going to change it unless someone runs for office and proposes the term limit bill and gets it passed? I agree we need a LOT of change... I just don't know how to affect it.

Popular posts from this blog

Thoughts and Ideas for 2024

 If you are truly pressed for time, just read the bold, italicized, and underlined sentences. That won't take you long at all! Another year has passed and if you are reading this, a new one is getting ready to start (or has started) for you. New Year’s celebrations are a time for reflection on what has happened and also a chance to start anew. New Year’s resolutions are a manifestation of this. Weight loss plans, gym proprietors, exercise equipment makers, and others know this. If you have watched any TV, gone online, or read any magazines or newspapers you know that the people that make their living selling and signing people up for those things are hitting it hard. We like new beginnings and the chance to reset and set new goals. Losing weight, stopping smoking, cut back or stopping drinking, and other things a lot of folks see as improvement are at the forefront of our collective thoughts and efforts this time of year. Although not a real advocate of New Year’s resolutions, I

A Serious One -

OK, the second in one day - something is going on! I wanted to do a blog on perspective. Life and our evaluation of it is based a LOT on perspective. I got a great example of this yesterday. My wife is disabled!! Officially. Perspective - - - On face value, that would not appear to be a good thing. Disability is not to be cheered. Ah, official disability is (or can be). My seventeen year old was here yesterday when my wife opened the letter and we were cheering for disability. She made a comment that is was weird that we were happy with Mom being disabled. I explained we weren't, but... My wife's condition is affected not one bit by what the doctors, bureaucrats, or anyone else labels it. She is no more nor no less disabled or ill than prior to getting the letter. However, getting the letter signifies official legal acceptance of her disability. That will hopefully lead to a lessening of the financial burdens of her condition and let us deal exclusively with the physical

Even more Questions

You may get this more if you read (or re-read) these older posts: "A Serious One" from 4/6/08 "Alphabet diseases" from 11/13/07 and "Questions" from 1/20/08 I am still trying to get answers to the Questions asked in the post above. I have not found any that are worthy of printing. I have come up with more questions: How does one handle seeing the continual decline of their spouse and not being able to do a thing about it? How do you take the inability of your 53 year old wife to get out of bed, or in and out of the shower unaided? How do you answer questions that beg not to be asked, like: will I see Bailey (our daughter, a rising senior)graduate; will Hannah (our granddaughter - almost 3) remember me; or will I see Landon (or grandson - 6 months) walk? How do you comfort your bride of 35+ years when she looks at you with tears streaming down her face? Most of all, how do you offer support and help when you are so damn mad at the world and the situa